<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Dose of social media: Curate the real-time Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beatblogging.org/2009/07/31/friday-dose-of-social-media-curate-the-real-time-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beatblogging.org/2009/07/31/friday-dose-of-social-media-curate-the-real-time-web/</link>
	<description>Pushing the practice of beat reporting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cusumano</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2009/07/31/friday-dose-of-social-media-curate-the-real-time-web/comment-page-1/#comment-6020</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cusumano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=4374#comment-6020</guid>
		<description>Re: the misconception that Twitter is only for young people, I see a few reasons non-Twitter users would see it this way.

For starters, the language of Twitter (i.e. tweeting) is a little too cutesy for most, it just sounds like a little kid&#039;s toy, not a powerful network for seeing what people are discussing at any given moment.

Secondly, one of the key traits of Twitter is the ability to update anywhere via a text message on your cell phone, and texting more often associated with teens than adults.

Thirdly, and this goes back to the premise that most adults don&#039;t fully understand what Twitter is and should be used for...if  they view the service as a means to share mundane details about your day-to-day (like what you&#039;re eating), that kind of time-waster is probably viewed by adults (who have jobs) as something they can&#039;t afford...but their unemployed kids can.

@MizzouCus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the misconception that Twitter is only for young people, I see a few reasons non-Twitter users would see it this way.</p>
<p>For starters, the language of Twitter (i.e. tweeting) is a little too cutesy for most, it just sounds like a little kid&#8217;s toy, not a powerful network for seeing what people are discussing at any given moment.</p>
<p>Secondly, one of the key traits of Twitter is the ability to update anywhere via a text message on your cell phone, and texting more often associated with teens than adults.</p>
<p>Thirdly, and this goes back to the premise that most adults don&#8217;t fully understand what Twitter is and should be used for&#8230;if  they view the service as a means to share mundane details about your day-to-day (like what you&#8217;re eating), that kind of time-waster is probably viewed by adults (who have jobs) as something they can&#8217;t afford&#8230;but their unemployed kids can.</p>
<p>@MizzouCus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

