<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clay Shirky: Every time a consumer joins the new media landscape, a producer does too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beatblogging.org/2009/06/23/clay-shirky-every-time-a-consumer-joins-the-new-media-landscape-a-producer-does-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beatblogging.org/2009/06/23/clay-shirky-every-time-a-consumer-joins-the-new-media-landscape-a-producer-does-too/</link>
	<description>Pushing the practice of beat reporting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:26:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2009/06/23/clay-shirky-every-time-a-consumer-joins-the-new-media-landscape-a-producer-does-too/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=4116#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>It so feels like you&#039;re clutching at straws with this professional / amateur refrain.  &quot;We have magic, they are muggles.&quot;  &quot;Surely they won&#039;t let black people play basketball.&quot;  Same whine of everyone who is afraid of change.   I&#039;m sure there are plenty of very talented and highly educated &#039;amateurs&#039; who will do some very excellent curation, analysis and trend identification as well. 

This challenge is about talent, ability and energy and creativity.  And finding a niche.  Not by hoping this is a temporary disruption of the rules. There are no new rules to understand.  There is no new model. There won&#039;t be. Its anarchy; may the best, most interesting writer win.  The mediocre, professional accreditation or  not, will need to find work elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It so feels like you&#8217;re clutching at straws with this professional / amateur refrain.  &#8220;We have magic, they are muggles.&#8221;  &#8220;Surely they won&#8217;t let black people play basketball.&#8221;  Same whine of everyone who is afraid of change.   I&#8217;m sure there are plenty of very talented and highly educated &#8216;amateurs&#8217; who will do some very excellent curation, analysis and trend identification as well. </p>
<p>This challenge is about talent, ability and energy and creativity.  And finding a niche.  Not by hoping this is a temporary disruption of the rules. There are no new rules to understand.  There is no new model. There won&#8217;t be. Its anarchy; may the best, most interesting writer win.  The mediocre, professional accreditation or  not, will need to find work elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
