Lessons from Reporters, Tools of the Trade - by Joe Ruiz on Thursday, April 9, 2009 14:21 - View Comments

Trying is a prerequisite of innovation

Joe Ruiz is the nightside Web editor for KSAT.com in San Antonio, Texas. You can find him on Twitter or at his blog. He is currently working as one of the new media track leaders for the upcoming National Association of Hispanic Journalists convention scheduled for June in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

With a smaller staff at my news organization, we’re at a disadvantage when it comes to covering some stories the way they deserve, but one of the strengths of our newsroom has been breaking news coverage. I have a few people who’ve taken to using social media tools for our work, and it’s actually helped us do our jobs better. One of our reporters and a few of our video journalists have started using Twitter and Qik to provide news coverage faster than our counterparts.

It’s been fairly simple with the technology and even more so because my coworkers believe it’s to our benefit as a news organization. Let’s face facts: No matter what technology is available, if you don’t have people willing to try, it means nothing. We’ve been lucky since more and more people in our newsroom have been willing to accept the benefits — or at the very least, try them out — of social media and its strengths.

One of my favorite examples has been our recent coverage of an apartment fire . One of our VJs carries a jailbroken iPhone loaded with Qik (he’s one of five VJs with Qik installed). Once the fire call came out, Sam Lerma headed to the scene and immediately began streaming with his iPhone. He had some extra scene video as well as an interview with the fire department spokesman. But here’s where we did better than every other news organization in town: We had it live. Using Qik’s embed code and adding it to our story, we streamed Sam’s interview and had promotion from our breaking news coverage to give us a nice boost on our page views and time spent on our site.

Of course, our story’s no Hudson River plane ditching, but it’s one of the ways we bring breaking news to our readers. I know we’ve done a good job because when news breaks, our numbers spike. We’ve earned the respect of our readers by offering them another way to get news as fast as we can provide. One of our reporters keeps his iPhone ready to do video and send photos so we can show images without having to wait for videos to be fed.

While most of our guys have iPhones, two have Samsung phones that also work with Qik, so it’s not necessarily that you need the latest, most expensive technology. You have to be, however, willing to try with whatever you have or can afford. Social media is a wonderful tool when used correctly, but as I wrote above, you have to be willing to try what’s available.

The best tools mean nothing if you’re not willing to try.


Subscribe to BeatBlogging.Org via RSS.



  • http://savethemedia.com Gina CHen

    I think this is a great example because … it’s not the Hudson River plane landing.

    Newspapers, TV, the news media in general do a great job of covering huge breaking stories. That’s not the problem. If you can’t cover a spectular plane landing in the middle of a river, you’ve got problem.

    But I think this post is a good example of using new media application in the everyday. Every story doesn’t have to be some grand multi-media package that took months to put together. Video, instant photos, Tiwtter should be part of the everyday story; the routine story. These aren’t tools for the Sunday stories. They should be part of a journalist’s normal routines to make the story more accessible to readers/viewers and give them more options for how they get their news and information.

  • http://www.joeruiz.net Joe Ruiz

    Gina, you’re absolutely right. One of the problems I ran into early on — and still deal with to an extent — are the thoughts from others about scooping ourselves and giving the competition the story before the newscast. I work in a competitive TV market where a half-point in the ratings can mean 1 over 2.

    I’ve dealt with reporters or assignment editors not wanting to put a story online or tweet information too soon so as not to give the other media a heads-up. We know they monitor us, but my prevailing thought has always been that if they’re using our Twitter account to catch up, that’s not their main problem.

    One thing I feel like I’m probably wrong about has been my unwillingness to take the new media teachings to all our staff. Since I’ve been at my job, I’ve pretty much let the reporters/photos/producers show interest, then I’ll jump in and find what works best for them. I’ve been reluctant to push teaching on everybody because I don’t want to force them to learn. I figure if they choose not to, they can deal with the consequences later on. Again, that’s probably the wrong approach and I’d love to read what others think.

blog comments powered by Disqus
About BeatBlogging.org

BeatBlogging.org was a grant-funded journalism project that studied how journalists used social media and other Web tools to improve beat reporting. It ran for about two years, ending in the fall of 2009.

New content is occasionally produced here by the this project's former editor Patrick Thornton. The site is still up and will remain so because many journalists and professors still use and link to the content. BeatBlogging.org offers a fascinating glimpse into the former stages of journalism and social media. Today it's expected that journalists and journalism organization use social media, but just a few years ago that wasn't the case.

About the Author of this post
Joe Ruiz is the nightside Web editor for KSAT.com in San Antonio, Texas.