<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists are being asked to do more online, often without guidance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beatblogging.org/2008/10/29/journalists-are-being-asked-to-do-more-online-often-without-guidance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/10/29/journalists-are-being-asked-to-do-more-online-often-without-guidance/</link>
	<description>Pushing the practice of beat reporting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Vetter</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/10/29/journalists-are-being-asked-to-do-more-online-often-without-guidance/comment-page-1/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Vetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=795#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>Yes, we absolutely have to have a plan at some point. BUT, if people don&#039;t understand the tools and technology, how can they formulate a plan? Yes, we ask our folks to get on the platforms and try them out. Can&#039;t see what&#039;s wrong with that. It&#039;s their responsibility to keep up with what&#039;s happening on their beat and in the media world. Not sure what&#039;s wrong with that expectation. (Yes, I&#039;m an editor who moved to online, and I tell people to get on and try. First step.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we absolutely have to have a plan at some point. BUT, if people don&#8217;t understand the tools and technology, how can they formulate a plan? Yes, we ask our folks to get on the platforms and try them out. Can&#8217;t see what&#8217;s wrong with that. It&#8217;s their responsibility to keep up with what&#8217;s happening on their beat and in the media world. Not sure what&#8217;s wrong with that expectation. (Yes, I&#8217;m an editor who moved to online, and I tell people to get on and try. First step.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/10/29/journalists-are-being-asked-to-do-more-online-often-without-guidance/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=795#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Patrick,

I came across this post by Jeremiah Owyang from somebody and it made me think of this post. 

http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/01/17/stop-focusing-on-the-hammer-and-think-about-the-house/

I&#039;ll admit, at my news org (TV/Web site), we&#039;ve kind of just thrown it together and are trying to see what sticks. No excuses, I just haven&#039;t set a plan for how we want to build the house and I&#039;ve screwed around with the hammer and nails too much.

As far as your other point, I&#039;m going to have to come up with the boundaries quick, as one reporter has already tweeted something that could bite them in the ass, and I had to have them quickly delete the message (not that it&#039;s not still available for somebody who looks hard enough, but it&#039;s not just sitting there in the open anymore).

But to answer the question -- and I know we&#039;ve discussed it on Twitter, too -- no, we don&#039;t have a specific plan in place for our staffers, and if I don&#039;t set it up soon, I know we&#039;ll either get burnt or do something we could regret.

The tools are great, but figure out what you need/want them for first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>I came across this post by Jeremiah Owyang from somebody and it made me think of this post. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/01/17/stop-focusing-on-the-hammer-and-think-about-the-house/" rel="nofollow">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/01/17/stop-focusing-on-the-hammer-and-think-about-the-house/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit, at my news org (TV/Web site), we&#8217;ve kind of just thrown it together and are trying to see what sticks. No excuses, I just haven&#8217;t set a plan for how we want to build the house and I&#8217;ve screwed around with the hammer and nails too much.</p>
<p>As far as your other point, I&#8217;m going to have to come up with the boundaries quick, as one reporter has already tweeted something that could bite them in the ass, and I had to have them quickly delete the message (not that it&#8217;s not still available for somebody who looks hard enough, but it&#8217;s not just sitting there in the open anymore).</p>
<p>But to answer the question &#8212; and I know we&#8217;ve discussed it on Twitter, too &#8212; no, we don&#8217;t have a specific plan in place for our staffers, and if I don&#8217;t set it up soon, I know we&#8217;ll either get burnt or do something we could regret.</p>
<p>The tools are great, but figure out what you need/want them for first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMNT links of the week #1 &#124; Old Media, New Tricks</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/10/29/journalists-are-being-asked-to-do-more-online-often-without-guidance/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>OMNT links of the week #1 &#124; Old Media, New Tricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=795#comment-818</guid>
		<description>[...] From Beatblogging, here&#8217;s a post about how reporters are being asked to do more online &#8212; without much help. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Beatblogging, here&#8217;s a post about how reporters are being asked to do more online &#8212; without much help. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks for October 30th through October 31st &#124; Jared Silfies</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/10/29/journalists-are-being-asked-to-do-more-online-often-without-guidance/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks for October 30th through October 31st &#124; Jared Silfies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=795#comment-775</guid>
		<description>[...] Journalists are being asked to do more online, often without guidance &#124; BeatBlogging.Org - Thornton makes a compelling point &#8212; throwing technology at a problem isn&#039;t solving anything. First you have to plan out what to use and why it&#039;s effective. Then you implement the technology. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journalists are being asked to do more online, often without guidance | BeatBlogging.Org &#8211; Thornton makes a compelling point &mdash; throwing technology at a problem isn&#39;t solving anything. First you have to plan out what to use and why it&#39;s effective. Then you implement the technology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Colville</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/10/29/journalists-are-being-asked-to-do-more-online-often-without-guidance/comment-page-1/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Colville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=795#comment-739</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re using many cool and hip tools over at findingDulcinea, and find that they&#039;re working great. Our hot list includes Topix, which provides us a commenting service, Diigo, Twitter, StumbleUpon, Facebook, Delicious, Yahoo! Buzz and Digg. 

These tools bring a diverse and curious audience to our site. They all come for different reasons and stick around for different reasons. 

But these sites - particularly the wonderful Diigo - are also excellent storing and research tools for us. We use them to get wider angles on what&#039;s happening - what&#039;s already been covered, what hasn&#039;t, and how we&#039;re going to add to the conversation. 

We may not know what the lifespans of these tools are in the grand scheme of Web 3.0, but as journalists, we&#039;re pretty happy with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re using many cool and hip tools over at findingDulcinea, and find that they&#8217;re working great. Our hot list includes Topix, which provides us a commenting service, Diigo, Twitter, StumbleUpon, Facebook, Delicious, Yahoo! Buzz and Digg. </p>
<p>These tools bring a diverse and curious audience to our site. They all come for different reasons and stick around for different reasons. </p>
<p>But these sites &#8211; particularly the wonderful Diigo &#8211; are also excellent storing and research tools for us. We use them to get wider angles on what&#8217;s happening &#8211; what&#8217;s already been covered, what hasn&#8217;t, and how we&#8217;re going to add to the conversation. </p>
<p>We may not know what the lifespans of these tools are in the grand scheme of Web 3.0, but as journalists, we&#8217;re pretty happy with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

