<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing the News &#8211; A Means to Get Your Sources Engaged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beatblogging.org/2008/04/11/playing-the-news-a-means-to-get-your-sources-engaged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/04/11/playing-the-news-a-means-to-get-your-sources-engaged/</link>
	<description>Pushing the practice of beat reporting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Specht</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/04/11/playing-the-news-a-means-to-get-your-sources-engaged/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Specht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=132#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Hard to get my head around the details of this geek-tastic Google story, but I&#039;m excited to see a promising news game format.

It would be neat to extend the role-playing  some more: after you get a majority verdict on what one actor will do (say, Amazon), you could ask readers to come back and guess what the other actor (say, Google) would do in response to that. Keep it going a little bit.

Thanks, David, for pointing this out!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to get my head around the details of this geek-tastic Google story, but I&#8217;m excited to see a promising news game format.</p>
<p>It would be neat to extend the role-playing  some more: after you get a majority verdict on what one actor will do (say, Amazon), you could ask readers to come back and guess what the other actor (say, Google) would do in response to that. Keep it going a little bit.</p>
<p>Thanks, David, for pointing this out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: culturite</title>
		<link>http://beatblogging.org/2008/04/11/playing-the-news-a-means-to-get-your-sources-engaged/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>culturite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beatblogging.org/?p=132#comment-48</guid>
		<description>&#039;News scenario games&#039; are a great idea, David. I&#039;d like to see what we could make happen on NowPublic.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;News scenario games&#8217; are a great idea, David. I&#8217;d like to see what we could make happen on NowPublic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

